As so-called prosperity of Britain rose gradually 18th century onwards, we discovered an interesting co-relation with rising incidence and enormity of famines that ravaged length and breadth of Bharata. We also found much to our horror that almost every famine was preceded by ‘export’ of millions of tonnes of food grains to Britain. This so-called ‘export’ of food grains was neither coercive nor voluntary as it was sheer robbery of food from Hindu-natives of Bharata by British-intruders to feed those colonial-suckers sitting far away in England surviving on plundered wealth from colonised nations. There is one more macabre co-relation with the documented reality that millions had perished in those famines and British-intruders who had captured economy rubbed salt into our mangled wounds instead of launching massive relief operations. Let us count a few famines, legacy of ‘British-governance’ hanging proudly in the ‘Hall of Colonial-shame’ –

Great Bengal famine in Bihar and Western Bengal during 1769-70 perished 2 to 10 millions in ten months while East India Company raised taxes; Chalisa famine in Delhi, Western Oudh, Eastern Panjab, Rajputana and Kashmir during 1783-84 depopulated large tracts of 11 millions; Doji Bara or Skull famine in Madras, Deccan, Gujarat, Marwar during 1791-92 killed 11 millions and a very large numbers could not be cremated or buried; Agra famine in Agra province, Delhi, Hissar during 1837-38 decimated 0.8 million; Upper Doab famine in Upper Doab of Agra, Hissar, Panjab, Eastern Rajputana during 1860-61 witnessed 2 million deaths; Odissa famine in Odissa, Bihar and Ganjam during 1865-67 that killed 4 to 5 millions while Viceroy ‘Lord’ Lytton declined relief ‘for the risk of shirking by workers, ‘let British public foot the Bill for its cheap sentiment as mere distress is not a sufficient reason for opening a relief work’ while ‘exporting’ 10 million tonnes of rice to Britain; Rajputana famine in Ajmer, Eastern Panjab during 1868-70 killed 1.5 millions; Southern Bharata famine in Madras and Bombay during 1876-78 consumed 10.3 millions to death as the Viceroy Lytton had left them to ‘market forces’ to depend on for survival; Indian famine in central India during 1896-97 took a toll of 12 to 16 millions as Viceroy Curzon found ration quota ‘dangerously high’ and stiffened eligibility for relief; Indian famine in central and western India during 1899-1900 killing 3 to 10 millions and finally Bengal famine in Bengal that perished 3 million lives during 1943-44. Bihar famine was effectively attended by Lt. Governor of Bengal Richard Temple leading to nil mortality and for that he was severely criticised for ‘spending too much on famine relief’. When he provided rice from Burma to starving Odiyas in 1866, he was bitterly condemned for ‘keeping Indians alive as if it was duty of the British Government.” Mercifully, one British Professor Davis commented, “London was eating Indias bread while Indians were dying in a famine.” Those too weak to work in British labour camps to earn to eat during famine, were declared ‘unused to work’ and left to die by the roadside. Numbers were too high for miserable relatives to cremate hence, thrown into abandoned wells, mothers were compelled to sell their children for grub, husbands had to push their wives into wells to protect them from starvation and rapes while strict orders were issued to completely black out details of those Britain engineered Famine-Genocides. If Arya Samaj, RK Mission, Brahmao Samaj, Zamindars, wealthier natives and diaspora had not contributed their best and supported starving poors, often stealthily, probably large tracts of land mass would have been completely rendered devoid of human population. 

Cattle too, perished in millions as ‘export’ of hides from Bharata rose 25 time during 1860 to 1900. Mercifully, those British plunderers did not blame starving and dying Hindu-natives of cattle-genocides to escape starvation. Compensation for cattle death was hardly ever on their active agenda. Pittance disbursed whatsoever, was somehow recovered from them in due course.    

It required multiple famines and millions of terrible deaths that British-robbers stirred into a whiff of action to formulate following guidelines in 1900 under supervision of Viceroy Curzon –

“By acknowledging moral responsibility, the government should launch relief measures,

The code on famine should be revised,

There should be no delay in providing food grains and other assistance,

A Commissioner for famine should be appointed,

Develop an irrigation facilities,

The Agriculture Bank should be set up to provide people with an assistant.”

Even these guidelines were doomed to fail as corridors of history witnessed terrible Bengal famine of 1943 after their entire stock of food was snatched away by those British-bandits and ordered to be diverted to British soldiers engaged in World War-II by their Prime Minister Winston Churchill who did not miss the opportunity to rub salt into wounds by tendering a macabre advice to dying brown Hindus to ‘multiply like rabbits’.

If some 5 millions died worldwide in all wars pooled together in 107 years from 1793 to 1900, 19 millions died in Bharata alone due to Britain sponsored famines in just 10 years from 1891 to 1900. It may be pertinent to note that 25 millions were killed during Joseph Stalins political ‘Consecration’ of Russia, 45 millions were done to death by Mao of China and declared ‘Cultural Deaths’ and 55 millions sacrificed themselves during WW-II for reasons best known to the ‘Cosmic Creator’. In view of those figures, genocide of 35 millions during British occupation of the country due to famines and epidemics is not such a high number that may embarrass the ‘Royal Kohinoor Crown’ while showing up in public !! However, horrific deaths did embarrass even an ardent admirer of British ‘Liberalism’ Dadabhai Naoroji but British-Intruders cared two hoots for people dying on roads like dogs. British ‘Liberalism’ admired by Naoroji did not allow those British-robbers to provide succor to starving millions as it was based on following principles of Adams Capitalism –

“Not to disrupt market forces as free trade principles were sacrosanct,

Land mass of Bharata was unable to sustain such a ‘large’ population according to Malthusian theory and

Never spend revenue on unplanned verticals of budget”

There were stray intellectuals roaming in wilds who had the gumption to declare government intervention in famines was regressive as forces of nature were out to curb overpopulation and the best argument they proffered in their defence to establish ‘no famine theory’ was that net population however did rise ! That such stray intellectuals were not assassinated by those starving millions for the better, happens to be a rude surprise even today. British-robbers and their masters in London used to blame every conceivable factor under the sun responsible for Famine-Genocides except themselves who had captured power by all means and running the administration. However, Will Durant washed out all their excuses and alibis by declaring unequivocally, “…merciless exploitation, brutal collection of high taxes in the very midst of famine..”. They even discouraged and stonewalled relatively wealthier Hindu natives supporting starving ones calling all that superstition and ostentation disregarding the institution of ‘Dana’ so deeply ingrained into Hindu DNA. Pronouncements of the then Viceroy ‘Lord’ Lytton bordered monstrosity when he ordered his Babus, “…discourage relief works in every possible way as mere distress is not a sufficient reason for opening a relief work.”  

Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen established through his so-called exhaustive research that famines do not occur in democratic regimes as information channels are open and the institution of public accountability allows proper distribution of food to all affected. He emphasised that root-cause of famines is not lack of food but lack of accessibility. We do not know how his dubious theory can explain famines under British occupation as food was snatched away by British-intruders and hapless people were left to die like dogs on open grounds. Only if British-intruders had imposed democracy after plundering food grains from Hindu natives, then the system of accountability would not have allowed even a single famine death by ensuring accessibility to food in spite of being snatched away !! Then Nobel Prize in Economics for Amartya Sen would have been justified in all its perpectives and his doctrine coming out in flying colours !!        



And followed it up by denying BJP power of Bengal as almost 25% Bengali Hindu-s voted for AITMC, thereby denying themselves a golden opportunity to ‘begin with the beginning’, writing a new Platinum-story of development of Bengal. Even centuries of brutal savagery of Bengali-Hindus by anti-Hindu forces in Bengal have miserably failed to open their ‘eyes wide shut’. So effective is the nepenthe of Robindro Shongeet, Hilsa, Sondesh, Roshogolla, Machhed-Jhol, Sonar Amar Bangla that they are just unable to cut through the Moha-Maya of sheer decrepit regionalism and welcome another horizon of rising sun in their East. Even I am often greeted in social media with sarcasms like ‘You Hindiwallas just cannot understand Bengali culture, a blend of Iqbal…’ !! That’s pathetic indeed as I just pity at such a moronic-ignorance higher than even Mount Radhanath Sikdar !! Hasn’t that ‘culture’ dragged the beautiful state of Bengal to miserable depths of Hindu families being messaged ‘send your wife to us for a few days before you are allowed back into your village’ ?? Why has Bengal lost the warrior spirit of Dr. SP Mukherjee, Swami Vivekananda, Netaji Bose, Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, Khudiram Bose and so many others ?

After denying BJP power in Bengal to overhaul the State, several times they issued desperate appeals to Prime Minister, Home Minister to protect them from oppressors and marauders particularly during post-election violence. How could they at all come to their rescue under federal dispensation of Dr. Ambedkars Constitution ? There were even absurd statements issued by Tathagat Roy holding JP Nadda, Kailash Vijayavarghiya etc. still responsible for ‘security of BJP voters’ even after being denied victory to instal State Government in Kolkata. Centre could have intervened only by dismissing newly elected AITMC Government and imposing Central rule immediately inviting strong reactions all around and live possibility of the decision being knocked down by Supreme Court. Why should Centre undertake such a monumental political risk given every possibility that they might have again voted back AITMC to power under the intoxication of ‘Bahri Hindiwallas in Amar Sonar Bangla’ destroying their enormous political capital inviting thereby existential crisis for rest of the nation with Prime Minister and Home Minister weakened politically ? Their silence and absence of extra-ordinary actions are loud and clear –

Bengali Hindu-s must rise to defend themselves first before wailing for support from any ‘Bahri Hindi-walla or Gujarati-walla’.      

First Arabic madarsa of Bengal was raised in Calcutta in 1780 while five English madarsas (convent schools) around the same time while just one Hindu School in 1817. Hindu collaborator of the Hindu School underwent evolution to become ‘Ungreji Babu’, knighted and honoured. They allowed Christians, Jews and Muslims too to be admitted into this so-called Hindu School. So the Hindu School became secular while Bashak-s anglicised into Bysacks, Mittra-s into Mitters, Dutta-s into Dutt-s Das-s into Doss-s and Bose-s into Basu-s !! (By the way, one garment shop in Connaught Place of New Delhi evolved from Mittal & Co. to Meatle & Co. !!) These Baby-steps towards secular ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ blended with ‘Ahimsa’ turned into giant strides and the current status of Bengal does not need any extra-ordinary narration. They have been under anti-Hindu influence for almost thirteen centuries, four Buddhist, five Islamic and three Christian. Early history of Bengal is replete with internal tussles of dominance between Hinduism and Buddhism then among various Kingdoms for supremacy. Islamic dominance had its telling effect that not only continued but burgeoned into the horrifying scenario that we witness today. Islamic dominance climaxing with Mughals was so deeply entrenched that even Maratha invasion could not pull them out of that irrevocably. It was soon followed by colonial invasion and dominance for a long period that witnessed emergence of ‘Secular’ Brown-Sahibs deriving pride in Babugiri of Gora-s, selections in ICS (elite Babu-s with white wives) and English speaking that rendered them a class apart from rest of Hindu-s all over the country. Post-1947 history of Bengal is Congressism and Communism while no other original indigenous voice was allowed to be heard till it precipitated into such a crisis that Prime Minister had to personally intervene in Assembly elections extensively with a remarkable degree of success albeit short of decisive success. Enormity of delusion in Bengal is so stupendous that it will require decades of rigorous ‘Tapasya’ by them to pull out of that.

Those who claim to be intellectuals must convince themselves, these are not times of counting GDP, foreign exchange reserves, rate of economic growth, not even prices of petrol, onions or potatoes. We Hindu-s are right in the middle of a  civilizational war-zone where our survival is gravely at stake and there is nobody to don the mantle of Vasudeva Shri Krshna to open ‘eyes wide shut’ of those who happen to be ‘Ahimsa’/’Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ drunk. Why is that Bengali Hindu has to be repeatedly explained why to vote for pro-Hindu forces, why to oppose all anti-Hindu influences, merits of Hinduism and all that ? Why is that Bengali Hindu is unable to understand loudly delivered political messages in spite of thirteen centuries of persecution that are in their own interest while a mere whisper is enough for Abrahamics to herd-vote against BJP/RSS to the extent of 99% ? Why is that Hindu-s in Bengal are so apprehensive of a Sannyasi Prime Minister absolutely committed to their prosperity and well-being ? Has he ever harmed even a single Bengali or Bengal ? Why do ‘Bhadralok-intellectuals’ derive sadistic joy when they behold him struggling with his back to the wall to rescue the nation from serial crises instead of supporting him blindly ? Are they aware what might have been state of the nation if a duffer had been in South Block under UPA-III ? What has transformed them into ‘Bhadralok-buffoons’ ? How can Communists be intellectuals or intellectuals peddle Communism as both are Oxymoronic ?  All that with all their lofty claims of being greatest intellectuals identifying themselves with Nobel Prizes !!  

Prime Minister Modi himself is a fierce warrior busy on so many fronts hence he cannot waste his precious time in educating us how to be future-conscious and security-alert. More than Veda-s, it is more important to study Chanakya-Niti to grasp and combat all nefarious tricks of our civilizational enemies for the sake of our survival and Dharma, resist every attack even with a kitchen knife, may be even with bare hands. But never say die. Never accept defeat because Hindu alone deserves victory, no one else. Bharatavarsha alone deserves to be Vishva-Guru and remain Vishva-Guru forever to lead the world as Bharatavarsha is a nation of ascetics. Bhogi-s of west are not eligible, do not qualify to lead the world as Vishva-Guru. I expect Hindu-s of Bengal to be crazy admirer-followers of Dr. SP Mukherjee founded Party that is entirely committed to the nation.             



Second wave of Dragon-pandemic has been so sudden, so rapidly expanding that it dazed the world. Even so-called advanced countries with ‘world-class’ health infra-structure discovered themselves to be besieged by the tsunami of infections. Rise in pace of contagion and rate of deaths had been parallel for some 4-5 weeks, rate of infections compromised to decline but rate of deaths refused to follow the pattern causing grave concerns and some tense moments for the nation. Efforts of Central Government in containing the spread, minimising availability-hiccups of oxygen cylinders, essential medicines and necessities had been highly commendable. The way Prime Minister and UP Chief Minister burned mid-night oil in ameliorating agony of masses has added an unforgettable chapter in nations governance.

Dragon-pandemic provided a fertile ground for ‘Bharata-Breaking Forces’ (BBF hereafter) to resort to all sorts of nefarious activities, contrive conspiracies, join hands with Chinese at mid-night in their embassy, conduct sinister campaigns against indigenously produced vaccines, petitions in courts to stop vaccination programs and trials, holding serial press conferences to abuse Prime Minister, asking America to intervene in national affairs, asking people to reject home-produced vaccines etc. Some of these forces upgraded themselves to attack iconic institutions and movements like Yoga/Ayurveda by Patanjali of Haridwar, Amul of Anand etc. which have brought about revolution of sorts in the country. Amul have been under attack by Communist sponsored dubious ‘vegan movement’ out to prove existence of ‘vegetarian milk’ as a ‘healthy’ alternative to ‘non-vegetarian’ milk that does not exist at all !! Never for a moment the issue of providing employment to 10 crore stakeholders in dairy industry occurred to them nor the reality that milk is a complete wholesome food. The lobby wants us to consume factory-manufactured white colloidal solution mixed with synthetic vitamins and chemical preservatives. Demanding to destroy dairy industry to prevent cow-slaughter betrays their intellectual bankruptcy as there is a complete disconnect between them. Cow-slaughter can be prevented only through better vigilance and stricter implementation of relevant laws and not by destroying dairy industry.

Another issue raised, one of the latest ones is Ayurveda vs. Allopathy with Patanjali Yogapeeth on one side and Indian Medical Association on the other. Without moving into nitty gritty of two-way brouhaha, let us target our deliberations on comparative merits of both modes of medication in general. Ayurveda enjoys almost 2000 years of rich ancient history encompassing all aspects of curative and preventive medications including almost 100 types of surgeries too. Ayurvedic theory is based on ‘Dosha Vichar’ i.e. physiological disruptions with an incredible library of four lakh formulations documented in Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) of the CSIR. Ayurveda stresses on Sattvika holistic style of life wherein large number of life-style diseases do not visit at all, immunity exists at peak levels ruling out most of communicable diseases afflicting humanity. Ostensibly, Ayurveda is not only preventive and curative but also exceedingly pro-active in eradicating all health issues at the level of respective causes. On the contrary, Allopathy is mandated to address illnesses rooted in extravagant life style of consumerism dedicated to gratification of senses. Naturally then, it is impossible for Allopathy to be preventive mode of medication except with external agents like vaccines for a few communicable diseases. Even that too restricted to shelf-life of designated antibodies in bloodstream and not a day beyond that demanding booster shots at that. Hence, Allopathy is essentially curative that too, symptomatically. We may conclude now, Allopathic mode of medication is merely symptomatically curative, does never eradicate root-cause of diseases allowing augmented scope of relapses in due course. Even symptomatic cure may be merely cosmetic i.e. temporary and skin-deep. Moreover, Allopathic treatments are exhorbitantly expensive and it is common knowledge that people used to suffer silently and die instead of running into heavy debts for themselves and their next generation before centrally sponsored Ayushman Bharata Health Yojana made life easier for them.

On the issue of side-effects, Ayurvedic medicines score very high ranking. Ayurvedic medicines are mostly natural in nature that function in a natural harmonious manner causing minimal harmful effect if any. Most of such natural medicines presumably have nature-gifted molecules that do not allow any harmful side-effects when administered. However, it demands extensive research to identify those molecules or causes. On the contrary, large number of allopathic medicines are purified chemical derivatives with potential to cause side-effects. Being naturally curative and preventive, Ayurvedic medicines have permanent cure for almost all diseases while Allopathic medications have to be repeated several times over as and when symptoms surface. Patanjali Yogapeeth had demanded Allopaths to explain why permanent treatment for plethora of diseases viz. Hypertension, Diabetes, Arthritis, Colitis, Hepatitis, Migraine, Myopia, Psoriasis, Spondylitis, Parkinsons Disease, Alzheimers Disease, Insomnia, infertility, Drug-addiction etc. could not be developed in spite of more than 200 years of their existence. Ayurveda has permanent treatment for all diseases known so far. An ancient treatise on Ayurveda Sushruta Samhita has 180 Chapters to describe 1100 diseases, 121 surgical instruments, 650 medicines and 300 surgical procedures. In 1794, two British travellors had witnessed perfectly conducted Rhinoplasty on a patient with a severed nose by a Kumbhara i.e. potter, now classified as OBC !! They described it to their people in Britain vividly and steady stream of British-intruders began thereafter into the country and rest is history. In China all traditional medicines exist shoulder to shoulder with so-called modern medicines in every health facility. Covid Organics, a traditional medicinal preparation was successfully launched in Madagascar after testing on just 20 patients followed by export to other countries without even a whiff of outcry.  

By their own confession, Allopathy does not have permanent cure for any of those ailments while Ayurveda has which Allopaths never cared to study or research deeply out of probably, sheer arrogance. If Allopathy is in a dominant mode today it is only because it always enjoyed ‘first claim’ to health resources hitherto ! And Ayurveda has been consistently neglected under  malevolent influence of international pharma syndicates. It is widely known that for an ordinary disease like Urticaria Allopathy has nothing to offer as permanent cure except symptomatic relief through anti-Histamines while Haridra Khand offered by Ayurveda cures it permanently. Similarly in cases of Arthritis and Tennis Elbow, Allopathy at best can offer palliatives and steroids while Ayurveda eradicates it permanently through Yogaraj Guggulu and Chandra Prabhavati respectively. In the Chinese virus induced pandemic Corona, Allopathy had been struggling for a cogent response at every stage of the crisis and every response had been clubbed with a unique disclaimer so much so that even vaccine makers demanded legal immunity for unforeseen developments. On the contrary, Patanjali Yogapeeth launched their medication confidently with assurance of successful treatment. Biogetica founder Dr. Apurva Mehra established Ayurvedic medicines Reginmune and Immunofree outperformed all current lines of Allopathic treatments in trials conducted according to WHO guidelines. It is unfortunate that Allopaths did not even visit their establishment to verify their claims yet launched boisterous protest and demonstrations on roads with so many egos bruised. Why don’t champions of Allopathy challenge and verify claims of Ayurveda that they are well-prepared for any variety of viral or bacterial invasions yet to hit us ? Also absence of secondary infections in patients treated with Ayurvedic medicines ? Data generation so sacred to Allopaths, is just consequential to public investment in health sector by Government to which Ayurveda has not been a privileged ‘first claimant’ !!  

Western domination on indigenous healthcare system obliterated Ayurvedic diagnostic methods. Nadi experts are now hardly found who can narrate not only entire chronology of illnesses one might have undergone but diagnose even current illness proposed to be treated with amazing accuracy just by feeling patients pulse for a few seconds. It is inaccurate to say that Ayurveda never had diagnostic procedures as propagated by Allopaths harbouring vested interest.   

It’s ironical that number of Ayurvedic ingredients and constituents have been patented abroad who had not even heard about Ayurveda till recently, in addition to pioneers of Allopathy in Bharata now prescribing Ayurvedic preparations, Yoga and Pranayama. Since the term Ayurveda or Ayurvedic preparations embarrasses them, they prefer to address them as ‘herbal preparations’ !! Even much maligned and scorned Gomutra, a wonder drug has been patented so many times as mentioned herein by Americans –

US Patent No. 6896907 – For Anti Allergic, Anti infective, Nutrient & Anti-cancer

US patent No 6410059- for Antibiotic, Anti Fungal, Bioenhancer effect of Gomutra

US Patent No. 7718360- For Anti Oxidant, Apoptosis

US Patent No. 7235262- For cow urine distillate as a Bio-enhancer of Anti-infective, Anti-cancer agents & Nutrients

US Patent No. 7297659- For synergistic fermented plant growth promoting, bio-control composition

Cow urine distillate as bioenhancer.


Cow Urine – Therapeutic Value

Holy cow! So many patents

Chemotherapeutic potential of cow urine: A review 11.

Congress member of Rajya Sabha Oscar Fernandez, a Goan Catholic, tearfully confessed on the floor of Upper House right in front of the Vice President in Chair before live TV cameras, he survived his advanced cancer only due to medication of Gomutra. The way Gomutra purifies and detoxifies body of all dangerous molecules, is simply unparalleled as even supposedly most advanced medical science Allopathy has not been able discover or synthesize tried and tested counterpart thereof. The way IMA came out in favour of Allopathy with sinister communal overtones and proselytization agenda is exceedingly unfortunate and their Chairman must be prosecuted under sedition laws. Even ex-Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi did not know IMA was entirely a Christian NGO with anti-national agenda. If Christians are determined to call Allopathy ‘Christian healing’, practitioners of Ayurveda shall be well within their rights to propagate Ayurveda as ‘Sanatana Hindu healing’. Agenda of IMA ‘it’s we vs. they’ is reprehensible. As a matter of fact, Ayurveda is the ethos of Bharata, deeply ingrained into Sanatana DNA. In spite of the risk of digression, it may well be pertinent to underscore that Hindu-s have never been communal, it is only highly vicious activities of Missionaries and Jehadis that have provoked Hindu-s to be communal.

The much-maligned decision of Narendra Modi Government to integrate Bharatiya medication systems like Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, Yoga and Naturopathy as well as Homeopathy with western Allopathic healing is actually a much-needed systemic change that has been long overdue. However, such a harmony and synchrony are possible only when Allopaths shun their west sponsored sense of superiority, imbibe virtues of humility and modesty before agreeing to co-operate. 



British-occupiers never exceeded 0.05% of entire population matching Parsi community today in numbers, all the more stunning that even Russian dictator Joseph Stalin used to ridicule, ‘handful of intruders dominating India’. These figures illustrate the point so eloquently –

In 1805, British-occupied Bharata had just 31,000 British-Intruders out of which 21,000 in Army while 2,000 in civil governance.

By 1890, 6,000 British-Intruders were lording over 25 crore Bharatiya-s with 70,000 in their Army albeit very large number of Bharatiya soldiers in British uniforms.

In 1911, out of 1,64,000 British-Intruders in Bharata, 66,000 were in Army and Police while 4,000 in civil governance.

In 1931 this number was 1,68,000 with just 4,000 in civil rule over 30 crore Bharatiya-s.  

Is it possible to believe today, a 0.05% population lording over 30 crore natives in a far away country by the dint of their arrogance, snobbery, scotch, cigars, fork-spoon modernism and silly protocols ? What had happened to our ancestors ? Why did they turn so dumb, awestruck with colourless albeit spotted British complexions, suit-boots, neck-ties, funny manners, superiority complex, haughty temperament…why did we crash on their feet like a house of cards forgetting thousands of years old richest inheritance in the world ? When Reginald O’Dyer ordered to shoot unarmed innocent rural folks in Jallianwala Bagh at Amritsar, one of those soldiers could have very well shot him dead instantly to save hundreds of lives. They didn’t but shot dead hundreds on orders of a foreign intruder giving them orders to slaughter their own people. What sort of mindset was that ? It continues even now as Congress worship an Italian woman as their President and crores across the nation vote for the Party. Even Sikhs vote for the same Party to power in Panjab repeatedly insulting thousands of Sikhs who were butchered culminating into Operation Bluestar-1984 what to speak of Partition-1947 riots that killed some 30 lakh people on both sides of the border.

British intruders always bragged so brazenly, they established rule of law in ‘India’ !! The ‘rule of law’ established by them so to say, had to be forcibly imposed upon a highly refined and well-defined legal system in an ancient civilization. And the fact that they had to enact it coercively resorting to inhuman brutalities, speaks volumes on their brag and bluster. McCaulay was assigned the ‘holy’ task of  ‘legislating for a conquered race to whom blessings of our Constitution cannot as yet be safely extended’ which he zealously accomplished hidden behind insurmountable high walls. He authored a British-centric criminal law, enforced in 1861, still in force in the country with all its biases in favour of rulers, against the ruled. Whenever British-Intruders fell for anything and aspired to possess it, they first enacted a rule or law to facilitate and legalise its acquisition. So observed George Bernard Shaw during British occupation of the country, “When an Englishman wants something, he never publicly admits to his wanting it. Instead his want is expressed as a burning conviction that it is his moral and religious duty to conquer those who possess the thing he wants.” History is replete with instances to confirm and re-confirm the benumbing British methodology. Colonial occupation was smartly presented as ‘rule of law’ notwithstanding brown natives were never ever consulted before enacting those dubious laws. Constantly under a system of official surveillance wherein mails were intercepted and sleuths hired to chase anyone they so targeted. Many British hotels and clubs displayed ‘Indians and dogs not allowed’, justified in the name of ‘elitism’ or ‘exclusivity’. Hindu women, entirely autonomous over property, social rights and their bodies were subjected to ‘Victorian’ paternalism of men as husbands and sons. Breast Cloth Agitation (1813-1859) in Kerala is an interesting case in point. Rape laws enacted by British occupiers resembled ‘Sharia’ laws to a great extent allowing majority of cases going unreported or unpunished if at all reported.  

Judiciary was entirely racist in British occupied Bharata. Killing a Hindu domestic servant by a British-master attracted a mere six months imprisonment while a brown Hindu was sentenced to twenty years of rigorous imprisonment for an unsuccessful attempt to rape a British woman. Malaria used to be quite prevalent in British occupied Bharata that often caused spleen enlargement. Enlarged spleen could easily rupture even on a mild boot-kick causing death within a few minutes if not instantly. British boot-kicks in stomach were not known to be generally mild and British-masters kicking in stomach of domestic servants even on slightest provocation of minor faux pas, was more than common and resultant deaths too frequent. In 1875, when one Robert Augustus Fuller kicked his domestic help in his stomach on a minor shortcoming, he was declared guilty of ‘causing hurt’ and sentenced to a simple imprisonment of fifteen days or alternately compensate widow of the deceased with a pecuniary punishment of Rs. Thirty only !! ‘The Stout British Boot’ used to hit spleens of servants engaged to vigorously fan sleeping British-Intruder anytime in the middle of night if paused for even a water break. Even an ode was composed and circulated around to thumbs up ‘The Stout British Boots’ –

‘Let us sing, let us shout for the leather-shod foot,

And inscribe on our Banners, “The Stout British Boot.”’   

Britain ‘gratefully’ acknowledged significant decline in murder convictions in that country as most of violent British citizens were ‘exported’ to Bharata who busied themselves in rupturing Hindu-spleens. It was British model of colonial-miracles that converted ‘wilful murder’ in Britain into ‘causing hurt’ in the ‘primitive’ land of Bharata where people ‘multiplied like rabbits’, in words of their Prime Minister Winston Churchill. There was a bizarre case of ‘Natives against Europeans’, so ruled in Bangaluru when brown natives snatched arms of two British murderers who had ‘sportingly’ killed a brown boy and sentenced to imprisonment for six months. British assaults on brown natives far exceeded in numbers than retaliatory ‘brown’ responses. In yet another bizarre case, when the crime of murder was proved beyond an iota of doubt against a British-intruder, British Judge had no other option except to declare the White-killer ‘insane’ before exonerating him without even a semblance of punishment. Incidents such as British troops beating a brown-Hindu to death for refusing to arrange women for them, amounted to mere occasional events even if a regular feature. In 200 years of British occupation with thousands of Brown-Hindus being killed by those British-occupiers, there were only three cases wherein six British-occupiers were hanged to death for slaughtering brown natives.    

In 1765, one Mughal Darbari Narayan Singh asked his colleague about British-brutes of East India Company, “…when we have to take orders from a handful of traders who have not yet learned how to wash their bottoms after relieving themselves, what honour are we left with ?” Tissue-papers did not exist then !! American Anthropologist Nicholas Dirks let it be known to us, “…India was anthropologized in the colonial interest, a narrative about its social formation, its political capacity, and its civilizational inheritance began increasingly to tell the story of colonial inevitability and of the permanence of British imperial rule.” British-Intruders succeeded in occupying the nation due to treachery of few and passivity of the large majority which prompted Viceroy ‘Lord’ Mayo to comment, “We are all British gentlemen engaged in the magnificent work of governing an inferior race.” Those White Mleccha-s who learned from Hindu-s of Bharata how to clean their bottoms after attending natures call, plundered the country, brutalised us before calling us a ‘despicable, inferior race’.     

Note of acknowledgement –

This article was inspired by An Era Of Darkness authored by Shashi Tharoor and published by Aleph. Several facts have been excerpted from the same which happens to be one of the finest history chronicles read by me so far. I recommend to all to read the book and be accurately informed about colonial occupation of Bharata.  I thankfully and gratefully acknowledge to the author Shashi Tharoor for some of facts mentioned in this article from his title.



Medieval history of Bharata is mainly Hindu Holocaust-ory under constant and consistent efforts of all to be out of public glare, mostly relegated into backwaters of folklores. Hindu-s have hardly ever been assertive either in protecting themselves, honour of Hindu women or even Sanatana Dharma. Lofty ideals inherited from Sanatana scriptures continue to be pursued like timid cowards with a morbid sense of satisfaction without even daring to acknowledge, when those sacrosanct ideals were authored by our Rsi-s, Maharsi-s and Acarya-s, Abrahamic cults did not exist at all in Bharata hence, we could not be educated with precautionary and retaliatory measures to combat those brutal Abrahamic oppressions that came to us anyway. Savagery of serial Hindu-holocausts sporadically continued for some 800 years under the illusion of ‘this one is the last one’ following every massacre. Mass-uprisings did occur albeit too little too late, that too, entirely reactionary deeply ingrained in Hindu psyche and never pro-actively. Serial Hindu-holocausts had been the worst human holocausts known to humanity from annals of history recorded ever.

It is an issue of extreme concern and amazement that Hindu-s accepted rule of intruders over the country as ducks glide into water !! Resistance and revolt began only when invaders and intruders embarked on loot, plunder, proselytization and all other conceivable forms of oppression. Whenever Hindu-s were not unnecessarily tormented on personal counts whatsoever, it never bothered them who had occupied the country and who had been ruling over them to their utter humiliation and mortification. Such an attitude exists even today as we have already witnessed, post-2011 Hindu-awakening was triggered by oppressive actions of UPA Governments I and II headed by Antonia Maino,an Italian naturalised through her marriage to Rajiv Gandhi who succeeded his mother in Prime Ministerial position. If common Hindu masses had not been tormented by two Antonia Maino headed Governments, most probably world would have witnessed UPA-III in 2014 being installed and destruction of the nation would have continued unabated. A provocative question that hits my cerebrum these days happens to be whether Bharata would have been a sovereign nation today if and only if British Gora-occupiers had not been exceedingly oppressive, exploitative evangelists, extortionists and destroyers of nations cultural heritage.    

When Sanatana scriptures were authored by erudite Rsi-s, Maharsi-s and Acharya-s, Abrahamic faiths did not exist hence there was absolutely no reason for those scholars to insert Shloka-s warning generations to come about possible brutalities and savagery in store for our ancestors. On the same note, emphasis of anything resembling Hindu-unity was completely ignored because no such necessity was ever perceived even centuries after. These essentialities were perceived probably for the first time by Rsi Chanakya owing to oppressive rule of King Ghananda of Nanda-Vamsha, organised people to revolt againt him and coronated Chandragupta Maurya who laid down foundation of Maurya-Vamsha. As the Seer was highly successful in his efforts of regime change through a mass based revolution, he institutionalised it through his legendary work ‘Chanakya-Niti’. Policies and strategic directives enshrined in ‘Chanakya-Niti’ happen to be so much relevant today that it is now more important to study ‘Chanakya-Niti’ than even study of Veda-s in view of severe threats posed by Abrahamic cults !! This reality has been able to sink into very few Hindu minds viz. Union Home Minister Amit Shah who idolises him while majority of Hindu-s are still intensely intoxicated with dubious doctrines like ‘Secularism’, ‘Ahimsa’ and ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ rooted deep in Hindu psyche by Samrat Ashoka after his ‘Sannyasa’ propagating ‘Ahimsa’ as a standalone virtue.                  

Copious historical evidence is available from biographers, chroniclers, travellers and personal records from various sources that confirm Hindu-holocaustory beyond an iota of doubt. Several records from chroniclers of invading bandits went to the extent of glorifying their heinous crimes in the name of religious superiority or the notorious doctrine of ‘White mans burden’. They brutalised lakhs of Hindu men, women, plundered wealth, ravaged thousands of temples and monasteries. Let us now compile a few tragic events of Hindu-genocide to have a first hand perception of those horrible crimes perpetrated upon Hindu-s –

Mahmud al-Ghazni from Afghanistan invaded Bharata seventeen times from 1001 to 1026 AD. A chronicler of his court described few instances of brutalities perpetrated by him on Hindu-s in his work Tarikh-i-Yamini, “The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously at Thanesar that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river…but many of them were slain, taken or drowned… Nearly fifty thousand men were killed.”

In Taj-ul-Ma’asir Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri stated, “…when Qutb-ul-Din Aibak conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion.” That was during 1194 to 1210 AD.

Wassaf, a Persian chronicler wrote in ‘Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asar’ that “when the Alaul-Din Khilji  captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves.” He was second ruler of Khilji Dynasty during 1295-1316 AD. His Qazi read out Islamic law for Hindu-s to him thus, “Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.”

Bahmani Sultans in Deccan Bharata slaughtered 1,00,000 Hindu-s annually from 1347 to 1528. They always set out on Hindu slaughter spree like todays sales persons with individual targets to be achieved with a sense to ‘teaching Hindu-s a lesson’. These have been chronicled in detail by their courtier Mohammad Qasim Hindu Shah commonly known as ‘Firishta’. 

Timur, a Turk of Timurid dynasty invaded Bharata in 1398 and his gruesome brutalities were recorded in his memoirs Tuzk-i-Timuri. Over 1,00,000 Hindu prisoners of war were slaughtered in one go, probably largest single genocide on Planet Earth. He himself admitted, “they said that on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and foes of Islam at liberty. In fact, no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword…throughout the camp that every man who has infidel prisoners was to put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death. 100,000 infidels, impious idolaters, were on that day slain. Maulana Nasir-ud-din Umar, a counselor and a man of learning, who, in all his life had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure and the grain which for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers.”

Nadir Shah enjoyed the ‘fun’ of raising ‘mountain’ of Hindu-skulls after slaughtering Hindu-s in Delhi alone.

After defeating Rana Sanga in 1527 at Khanua in Rajasthan, Babur raised hills of Hindu-skulls and repeated it after he captured the fort of Chanderi.

30,000 Rajputs were slaughtered by Akbar in 1568 after capturing Chittorgarh.

Mughal bandit Babur captured some areas of Bharata in 1526 and it remained so till 1530 AD. In his ‘Baburnama’ he wrote, “I attacked Chanderi and by the grace of Allah captured it in a few hours. We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been Daru’l-Harb for years was made into a Daru’l-Islam.” In the same Baburnama, he composed a poem too to honour Hindu-slaughter –

For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer,
I battled infidels and Hindus,
I determined to become a martyr
Thank God I became a Killer of
Non-Muslims !

Badshah Nama, Qazinivi and Badshah Nama, Lahori describe atrocities of another Mughal despot Shah Jahan during years of his occupation from 1628 to 1658, “When Shuja was appointed as governor of Kabul he carried on a ruthless war in the Hindu territory beyond Indus…The sword of Islam yielded a rich crop of converts….Most of the women burnt themselves to death. Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars.”

Afghan invader Ahmad Shah Abdali reached Mathura in 1757 ravaging Bharata. Tarikh-I-Alamgiri chronicled brutalities perpetrated by his criminal gang of so-called soldiers thus, “Abdali’s soldiers would be paid 5 Rupees (a sizeable amount at the time) for every enemy head brought in. Every horseman had loaded up all his horses with the plundered property, and atop of it rode the girl-captives and the slaves. The severed heads were tied up in rugs like bundles of grain and placed on the heads of the captives…Then the heads were stuck upon lances and taken to the gate of the chief minister for payment. It was an extraordinary display! Daily did this manner of slaughter and plundering proceed. And at night the shrieks of the women captives who were being raped, deafened the ears of the people…All those heads that had been cut off were built into pillars, and the captive men upon whose heads those bloody bundles had been brought in, were made to grind corn, and then their heads too were cut off. These things went on all the way to the city of Agra, nor was any part of the country spared.”

Invasions of Mahmud Ghaznavi, Mohammad Ghori as well as Delhi Sultanate during 1192-1526 witnessed one of the largest massacres of Hindu-s in history. ‘Hindu-Kush’ mountain ranges were so named as it meant ‘where Hindu-s are killed’.

1,80,000 Hindu-s were slaughtered by Feroz Shah Tughlaq in Bengal in 1353.

Approximately 30,00,000 were brutally killed during Partition-1947 riots on both sides of border.

Banda Bahadur Singh was captured, heart of his son was pushed into his mouth then brutally tortured to death.

In 1943, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill ordered forcible snatching of foodstocks from Hindu-Bengalis to nourish British soldiers in WW-II. It led to famine of catastrophic dimensions and 70 lakh people died of starvation on roads exposed to vultures. The demon that Churchill was, sarcastically retorted later, let them multiply like rabbits ! This one Hindu-genocide perpetrated by Winston Churchill single-handedly equals or exceeds Nazi-holocaust of Jews by Hitler from 1941 to 1945.

Bengal has undergone repeated Hindu-pogroms at varying intervals. Noakhali riots witnessed 5,000 Hindu-s being killed, 4 lakh forcibly converted to Islam and countless Hindu women sexually ravaged.

There had been a nerve-rattling massive Hindu-genocide as recent as in 1971 in East Pakistan turned Bangladesh. Some one crore Hindu-Bengalis were displaced, any number between 2 to 4 lakh Hindu-Bengali women were savagely raped, their bodies brutalised and 30 lakh Hindu-s were brutally slaughtered during 10 month long genocide campaign in the then East Pakistan.    

Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the Past” observed, “The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster. Their temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands. The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers. Cloaking themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and pillage…”

Will Durant wrote in his ‘The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage’, “The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period.”

Francois Gautier affirmed in his ‘Rewriting Indian History’, “The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese.”

So wrote Alain Danielou in his book Histoire de l’ Inde, “From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of ‘a holy war’ of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races.”

Whenever the dreaded term ‘Holocaust’ is proffered, instantly holocaust of Jews by Nazis pops up in our minds notwithstanding numbers in serial Hindu-holocausts are far more than Jews killed by Nazis and severity of brutalities far excessive with Hindu-s. Even complete wipe-out of native Americans by white-intruders into American continent, genocide of Armenians by Ottoman empire and slaughter of millions of Africans do not cling to our memory. Root-cause of this strange phenomenon is two-fold with Jews bonding strongly among themselves while Hindu-s continued to remain fractured in innumerable groups and sub-groups based on a plethora of socio-economic factors with complete absence of Hindu-unity even for Hindu causes. If a racist westerner outrightly blames Hindu-s for their unmitigated woes and exonerates British-intruders for skimming benefits out of a society in siege, Hindu-s have sufficient grounds to turn contemplative and introspective. Hundreds of movies were directed by Europeans and Americans to expose Nazi horrors while in case of serial Hindu-holocausts, Hindu-s are not even aware of that thanks to handing over of nations entire education system to Communists in 1966 by the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and they mutilated entire education beyond recognition.

There have been large number of Hindu-warriors who fiercely fought those Mughal invaders and did not allow complete Islamization of Bharata. Raja Dahir of Sindh, Krshnadev Raya of Mysore, Rani Durgawati of Jabalpur, Raja Bhoj of Malwa, Maharaj Surajmal of Bharatpur, Chalukya and Solanki dynasties of Gujarat, Prthvi Raj Chauhan of Sambhar, Raja Narsimha Dev of Odissa, Raja Lalitaditya of Kashmir, Raja Suheldev of Bahraich, Maharana Pratap of Udaipur, Shivaji Maharaj and Peshvas of Maharashtra, Guru Govind Singh and Ranjit Singh of Panjab, Lachit Bhorphukan of Assam etc. During the era of British occupation, large number of revolutionaries beginning with Mangal Pandey, Laxmi Bai, CS Azad, Bhagat Singh, Ram Prasad Bismil, Sukhdeva, Rajguru, Lala Lajpat Rai, Vinayak Savarkar, Lokmanya Tilak upto Netaji Bose and his Indian National Army led multiple rounds of uprisings to throw away invaders and occupiers sacrificing their precious lives. While warriors of Mughal era were mostly let down by their home-grown moles acting as traitors, revolutionaries against British occupation were very badly let down by leaders of Indian National Congress founded by a Brit-Gora AO Hume and now headed by an Italian woman. McCaulays indoctrination followed by mutilation of our glorious history by Communists has percolated so deep in our neurons that any Hindu will be shocked if you tell him/her, Mountbatten was the last British-intruder who forcibly occupied ‘Viceroy House’ now known as Rashtrapati Bhavan. We must recall quite pertinently that his funeral was shouldered by the then Vice President Hidayatullah far away in London with Admiral RL Parreira as his pall-bearer !! Mercifully, the saxton who tolled bell behind the funeral was not a Bharatiya. When British Queen visited us in 1950s, she was warmly welcomed at Delhi airport with 21-Gun salute, by the then President Dr. Rajendra Prasad, Vice President Dr. Radhakrishnan and Prime Minister Nehru notwithstanding the fact that she had presided over a brutal regime of 200 years in Bharata responsible for multiple Hindu-Holocausts and siphoning off 45 Trillion $ worth of Hindu wealth !! They were spineless pathetic leaders devoid of self-esteem who desecrated serial Hindu-Holocausts and sanctified culture of Mir Jafars and Jaichands in the country for generations to come. When the demand was raised for the brutal British monarchy to tender an apology to us, Bharatiya Christians were in the forefront opposing the demand.  

Why should the world know about serial Hindu-Holocausts when we are gifted with such a mind-set and Brutus-conduct of invidiously treacherous politicians of Congress hitherto ??             



Indian Civil Service (ICS), known as Imperial Civil Service till 1947, was a so-called elite civil service raised by British-occupiers in British India during 1858-1947. They constituted proverbial ‘steel frame’ of British occupation of the nation whose writ ran over some 250 districts inhabited by 20 crore citizens. The elite service was governed under Section XXXII (32) of the Government Of India Act 1858 legislated by British Parliament. It was administered by a Secretary of State for India, a British Cabinet Minister presiding over a cadre with all senior and middle level British-Gora ICS “Civilians” to begin with as they were addressed, taught in so-called “best” British schools. Majority of British “Civilians” returned home in 1947 with declaration of freedom from forcible British occupation. Number of Indian-Sepoys for ICS gradually increased as governance became complex with  physically taxing jobs rose in numbers. By 1905, the cadre had 5% from Bengal alone (probably explaining roots of ‘Bhadralok snobbery, arrogance and drifting towards Marxism’). By 1947, there were 688 British “Civilians” while 322 ‘Deshi’ ICS-Sepoys, brown and dark brown in complexion. Entry of coloured natives into the service was deeply resented by Brit-Goras and by some of them, openly. One of them even objected by saying, “Government of India is not Indian. It is English…England has made herself responsible for India and she cannot shirk or divide the responsibility. No Indian can tell us what to do.” So they were vehemently averse to accepting Bharatiya-s in positions of authority. Till 1930s, senior positions in the cadre were not accessible to ‘Deshi’ ICS-Sepoys as British racism attained critical mass by mid-1880s. Majority of cases recommended for promotions to higher positions used to be rejected and only a miniscule were allowed to succeed intended more to dodge accusations of being racists rather than normal promotions.

Given their racist and imperialistic doctrine, Hindu-s were perceived as racially inferior heathens destined to be ruled by superior white British race. So sanctity of the gap between ‘rulers’ and the ‘ruled’ had to be maintained and anyone violating that, was immediately ostracized. British-Gora occupiers of the country were absolutely unable to concede excellence of any kind to native browns and dark browns. Wherever excellence in any field they discovered created by brown and dark brown Hindu-s, they ensured some strong link is established with their God, Jesus or the British Crown loaded with blood and tears of 70 countries that they colonised. ‘White Mans Burden’ so called is best symbolised and exemplified by Rudyard Kipling, a racist to the core of his conscience in his profoundly motivated composition as under –

Take up The White Man’s burden—
Send forth the best ye breed—
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives’ need;
To wait in heavy harness
On fluttered folk and wild—
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half devil and half child.

Take up the White Man’s burden—
In patience to abide,
To veil the threat of terror
And check the show of pride;
By open speech and simple,
An hundred times made plain.
To seek another’s profit,
And work another’s gain.

Take up the White Man’s burden—
The savage wars of peace—
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch Sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.

Take up the White Man’s burden—
No tawdry rule of kings,
But toil of serf and sweeper—
The tale of common things.
The ports ye shall not enter,
The roads ye shall not tread,
Go make them with your living,
And mark them with your dead!

Take up the White Man’s burden—
And reap his old reward:
The blame of those ye better,
The hate of those ye guard—
The cry of hosts ye humour
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:—
“Why brought ye us from bondage,
Our loved Egyptian night?”

Take up the White Man’s burden—
Ye dare not stoop to less—
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloak your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your Gods and you.

Take up the White Man’s burden—
Have done with childish days—
The lightly profferred laurel,
The easy, ungrudged praise.
Comes now, to search your manhood
Through all the thankless years,
Cold-edged with dear-bought wisdom,
The judgment of your peers !

When a dark brown Bharatiya ICS-Sepoy from a southern State was appointed in a remote district, local club having English ‘Civilians’ refused to admit him as an honourable member. He was severely handicapped in discharging his official responsibilities as most of important official work used to be discussed over drinks in blue mood in lawns of the clubhouse. Instead of blaming it as British-racism, many of them blamed faulty recruitment policy that allowed brown and dark brown Bharatiya-s into the so-called elite service of ICS. Poor man finally shot himself dead after a long trail of frustration and depression caused by the racial exclusivism and discrimination perpetrated upon him by British occupiers of the country while elite snobbery of ICS-Sepoys continued unmitigated before poor, plundered natives across the country. Ostensibly Club-culture, boot-licking and offering gifts to seniors and their wives etc. happen to be unadulterated British legacies we inherited and gladly perpetuated unremittingly even after 1947.

Satyendra Nath Thakur (anglicised as Tagore later) was the first to break this glass ceiling albeit he too, could knock at the position of a District Judge in Satara after 30 years of service overcoming plethora of obstacles. They all had to undergo excessive personal humiliation and insults including SN Thakur. Surendra Nath Banerjee was barred from promotions by accusing him of lying on his actual age in 1869, then awarded an insignificant position as a measure of racist humiliation. In 1874, he was duly dismissed from service for the offence of requesting for accommodation in British colony that housed senior British-Gora ‘Civilians’ !! He went on to become a distinguished freedom-fighter and a brilliant intellectual. British-Goras sacked him instead of using his talent for furthering national interest, not even colonial interest as they felt so much threatened and humbled by his talent. Similar was the case of Aurbindo Ghosh who stood second in ranks out of thousands yet summarily rejected as he was not skilled in horse-riding !! British-occupiers planted seeds of nasty rivalry so deep in Bharatiya soil that it continues even today in the country almost in every institution, in every discipline of activity. Starkly it came to the fore when appointment of Narendra Modi as Convener of Election Campaign Committee was announced for Lok Sabha-2014 elections resisted vehemently by senile old war-horses.  

Syed Mahmud, a Cambridge educated ICS-Sepoy, was appointed as Judge of Allahabad High Court in 1887 but without real authority. Continuous humiliation and discrimination led him to alcoholism and acute depression that snatched his life young, merely at 53 despite his being son of influential Syed Ahmad Khan, founder of Aligarh Muslim University critically required by British-Goras to sow seeds of Partition-1947 !! Differences in emoluments were too conspicuous to be ignored. To sum up, no parameter of discrimination and humiliation was ignored be that salaries, power enjoyed, seniority or career advancement. Repositories of senior level experience were all Brit-Goras who left the country in 1947 and the country was deprived of experienced manpower to govern thereafter.

During British occupation of the country all brown and dark brown ICS-Sepoys were mandated by Brit Gora-masters to remain bachelors till the age of 30 or so. That made them ‘sitting ducks’ to be ‘shot’ and ‘captured’ by scores of husband-hunting English lasses coming over to British occupied India after being rejected by elite British boys 1850s onwards, failing to get married in Britain. Those Cigarette smoking, wine drinking British Gori women used to be either ‘too fast’ or ‘too ordinary’ to be hitched by anyone there in Britain and ICS-Sepoys were ‘turbots’ and ‘helibuts’ i.e. best catches of the ‘matrimonial net’ for them. Since it was not possible to bleach them into Euro-Whites completely, it was an ernest endeavour to be closest possible to their race with their ‘better halves.’  Tales of comfortable life in British occupied India used to attract them to try their luck here after being rejected by eligible worthy British boys. As ICS-Sepoys were strictly prohibited from ‘fooling’ around with ‘Svadeshi’ brown Hindu women, they used to be easy preys being utterly bored and frustrated of loneliness by the end of their thirties. So they used to easily fall for the woman on ‘Love At First Come First Served’ basis !! These ‘Fishing seasons’ used to be live with entertainments, ball dances, golf / tennis matches etc. on Gymkhana grounds with ‘husband-hunters’ sardonically known as ‘Fishing Fleet’. Such fleets used to sail out to British occupied India from British shores in Autumn and return in Spring in case of being unsuccessful in ‘husband-hunting’ or for strong aversion to stay in British-occupied India for long. They were then known as ‘The Returned Empties’ in British cocktail circuits who were asked to pay for their return tickets. Successful members of the ‘Fishing fleet’ enjoyed life in British occupied India with English clubs (wherein Indians and dogs were not allowed to enter), tennis matches, elegant balls, tiger-hunting, flotilla of servants, maids, beauty sessions, salacious gossips, promiscuity and other extravagances. Needless to say, those British women were the worst racists who used to abuse Hindu-s / India whenever back home during summers and their heavily brainwashed brown and dark brown ICS-Sepoy hubbies were condemned to be pathetic listeners nodding abjectly. The phenomenon of ‘husband-hunting’ by this ‘fishing fleet’ came to an end by the end of WW-II followed by freedom battles but by that time some Nehru-s too, had ‘White-fisherwomen’ from the ‘fishing fleet’ to reckon with.

Today we shudder to visualise, what sort of agonies and humiliation our ancestors had to undergo in British occupied India perpetrated by their British-Gora occupiers.



This article ‘A Great Intoxication’ authored by Pavan K. Verma, ex-diplomat and Rajya Sabha member, appeared in The Times Of India on Feb. 27, 2021 on their editorial page. With great enthusiasm, Pavan expounded his Page-III intellectualism quoting even Goswami Tulsidasa to drive home his hidden grievances in the garb of pontifications held on weekdays at designated spots. By the time I concluded reading the article, it was more than obvious his favourite target is Prime Minister Narendra Modi who is a widely acclaimed world statesman who does not pay attention to such intellectuals (or whatever) like Pavan Verma, Markandeya Katju, Arun Shourie, two Sinhas etc. while serving the nation most selflessly. While the Prime Minister, a hard-core Svayamsevaka groomed by RSS, is entirely dedicated to the nation and prosperity of all, these Page-III worthies, convinced themselves to be the best available leaders and ideologues in country, have arrogated themselves ‘fundamental’ right to be at the centre of gravity of every government irrespective of nature of political party in power. And these fulminations, periodic outbursts of frustration are proceeds of that monumental indifference.

Now allow me to react and rebut him point by point which The Times Of India shall flatly decline to publish as they prefer writers of their own proclivities and idiosyncrasy howsoever obscure or even a street brand.

Pavan quoted Goswamiji, “Nahin kou asa janma jaga mahin, prabhuta pai jahi mada nahi.” i.e. Never was a creature born in this world, whom power did not intoxicate. Pavan interprets ‘Prabhuta’ as power that intoxicates everyone. Did ‘Prabhuta’ intoxicate Bhagavan Shri Rama even after He was coronated and enthroned ? Does Pavan know that His father-in-law Raja Janaka was a saint ? And Dasharatha an ideal King ? Did ‘Prabhuta’ or power intoxicate Lakshamana or Bharata ? He failed to cognise that power intoxicates only evil ones like Ravana albeit ‘Prabhuta’ even in Vibhishana failed to intoxicate him in spite of his being born in a community of Rakshasa-s. When ‘Prabhuta’ in Vibhishana was blessed with power of Lanka by Bhagavana Shri Rama, he fell at His feet and sought His life-long Bhakti. Does Pavan know difference between ‘Prabhuta’ and power ? Will the author certify that among politicians Sardar Patel, LB Shastri, Gulzarilal Nanda, AB Vajpayee were intoxicated or power-drunk among politicians if he hates Modi to much ?

Is arrogance really first chink in the armour of good intentions or a way to repel frustrated self-seekers like him from portals of power ? Prime Minister declared and confessed long ago, he lacks experience, may err but the error would never be ill-intentioned and solicited constant feedback with criticism. Is that humility of the highest order or arrogance, Mr. Pavan Verma ? Constant interactions through various means, Man Ki Baat, Pariksha Pe Charcha…are signs of arrogance amounting to absence of ‘consultative processes essential to ascertain what is really good for the people…” in his own words or something else !! By the way, whose ‘good for the people’ is he referring to ? Whimisical decision making !! Is he not aware, recent three farm laws were discussed, demanded and supported by wide spectrum of stakeholders ? Demonetisation ?? Did he expect PM to inform him before declaring it suddenly or should have been declared from ramparts of Lal Quila ? Are such actions and decisions discussed in public ? Did Pavan ever carp at decision taking processes during Nehru / Indira / Rajiv regimes ?

Inner party democracy (IPD) is the next issue he raised as a chink in the armour of good intentions. If he is insinuating at BJP/RSS, then I may declare with certainty, Pavan just does not understand the concept of inner party democracy. BJP/RSS combine have advanced far beyond the domain of inner party democracy and all decisions are taken with unanimity. Inner Party Unanimity (IPU) is not difficult to attain in a party like BJP because every member is committed to the nation and nobody has any personal agenda to boot. IPD is a necessity in so-called political outfits like Congress wherein every member has a personal agenda of loot, plunder and self-glorification. By the way, Communists too have IPU to boot as they are committed to the diabolical and demoniacal ideology, rathet Criminology of Karl Marx responsible for multiple genocides across the world, destruction of flourishing economies and mass rapes. Pavan Verma tom toms ‘collagial system’ of functioning ignoring the fact that Collagium system of appointment of Justices has destroyed Judiciary with so many Justices pursuing their political agendas. I hope Pavan Verma had voted in favour of National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill as Rajya Sabha member of JDU which was foolishly struck down by the ‘arrogant’ Judiciary challenged by those who championed the cause of Buckingham Palace Judiciary. No Government functioned through ‘individual centric fiats’ in his words except those headed by Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi. By the way, ManMohan Singh Government functioned through multiple individual fiats in addition to one ‘individual centric fiat’ always emanating from 10, Janpath with PIN code of 110001 !!! Nation was dazed at disastrous consequences while the world ridiculed us. Contempt for law, recklessness and ingrained tendency to deride authority of law seeded and nourished by Nehru-Gandhi-Vadra dynasty for seven decades rendered the nation unfit and ineligible for ‘democratic’ democracy. What we deserve is ‘authoritarian’ version of democracy and that alone shall work till such time ‘intellectuals’ like Pavan Verma get rid of their myopic perceptions and views.   

Third chink that he rued about is echo chamber, courtiers, sycophantic coterie, eggplant etc. He referred to yet another quote from Goswami Tulsidasa, “Sachiv baida guru tini jaun, priya bolahin bhaya asa, raja dharma tana tini kara, hoi begihin nasa” i.e. when a minister, a physician and a religious preceptor say pleasing words only from fear or hope of reward, all three – the state, health and faith – go to the dogs. It is a perfect fit on dynasty based parties like Congress, Samajvadi Party, AITC of MamataB that are already on the way to complete annihilation. If he is in any way insinuating at BJP which most probably he is not, then he shall have many eggs on his face to contend with. I hope Pavan remembers how ‘pleasing words’ of Intelligence Bureau led to disastrous defeat of Indira Gandhi post Emergency-1975 elections and how not so ‘pleasing’ words of the same IB prompted Prime Minister Modi to postpone several vital decisions in national interest.

Next issue he raised is about dissenters as enemies. Can Congress MPs screaming and staging walk-outs after their absurd demands being rejected by the Chair be called dissenters ? Can those who shout ‘Bharata Tere Tukde Honge…’ be called dissenters ? Can those signing secret agreements in Chinese Embassy without seeking permission from Ministry Of External Affairs be called dissenters ? Every action, I repeat every action of Modi Government since May 26, 2014 has been opposed with teeth, nails and claws by an army of contrarians instead of discussing and offering valuable suggestions. Can they be called dissenters ? Should then Government stop functioning at all in spite of having massive mandate from people and allow the nation to go to hell ? Has Pavan Verma turned senile or just crazy like Markandeya Katju, called ‘megalomaniac’ by Arun Jaitly ? What does he mean by dissidence ? Why should an elected Government with a well-defined election manifesto of their own, follow agenda of any other political party ? Why should such a Government be criticised on the basis of election manifestos or ideologies of other political parties who have been trounced in polling booths ? Why should ‘ a different opinion’ be conceded when people have massively endorsed their own sets of opinion at the hustings ? Did they follow these ideals when they were in power and BJP in opposition ? If a few political morons are going to create ruckus in public over defence acquisitions, are they not anti-nationals ? If a few mentally deranged ones scream in public ‘Modi mar jaa tu’ because they do not like an elected Prime Minister with the name Narendra Modi, are they not anti-nationals ? While such people deserve to be shot then and there, Pavan Verma is angry on their being called anti-nationals !!   

Sixth trait that he mentioned is burgeoning self-love. I find it so churlish, so ridiculous, so useless coming from a well-read diplomat turned MP turned nobody that I believe, it does not merit any reply at all. Probably he wishes Prime Minister of this powerful ancient nation to dress himself like an abject beggar !! It is abundantly uncultured to pass comments on someones clothes, personal likes or dislikes and Pavan failed to observe those cherished restraints.

Last but not the least is his wild imagination of determination to cling to power. I wonder why he did not narrate tales of Indira Gandhi clinging to power, subverting the Constitution, imposing Emergency-1975 and the way her perverted son traumatised entire nation. That happens to be the darkest phase of nations history and no other Prime Minister even dared anything like that thereafter. If by any chance he means to impute motives to AB Vajpayee, Narendra Modi clinging to power then he shall condemn himself to the worst order of intellectualism. However, such leaders must cling to power to save the nation from home-grown plunderers, traitors as well as venomous intellectuals too !! Very aptly he quoted Mirza Ghalib, “ Har bulandi ke naseebon main hai pasti ek din” i.e. in every pinnacle lies the seed of its decline. Pavan Verma already has seeds of his own decline growing at a natural pace along with that of all those ‘anti-nationals’ who ensured, nation does not re-attain golden glory looted centuries ago and continues languishing as a III-World country. His diatribe reminds me of useless bodies like the United Nations who at regular intervals issue ludicrous statements denouncing our internal policies and issues completely divorced from realities on ground. Does he continue receiving commandments from the United Nations even after quitting his not so illustrious diplomatic career ? 



Nobody knew or expected that appointment of RK Talwar as youngest Chairman of State Bank Of India on March 1, 1969 will write a unique chapter in banking history of the country and one individual would become a Lighthouse of Integrity for other bankers for decades to come. However it happened and he did that by the day of Aug. 4, 1976 when he was removed from office through a ‘Talwar Amendment’ i.e. an extra-ordinary amendment to the State Bank Of India Act passed by the then Parliament to facilitate his exit, barely 54 was he then. Indeed by the time at 5.30 pm on that day of reckoning when he coolly walked out of his office, history had been created.

Tenure of his Chairmanship of the bank was instrumental in transforming SBI into a dynamic organisation with multiple initiatives of innovative banking, revival of sick units, thrust on rural development, simplification of archaic procedures bequeathed by British-occupiers of the country, analysis of corporate annual reports, restructuring of entire organization etc., far ahead of his times. Intensely rooted in principles and ethics, he was renowned for his impeccable integrity and professional dynamism. Vehement opposition to arbitrariness, transparency in decisions and transactions were his buzzwords. Being a highly respected professional banker, he resolutely refused to compromise on principles so dear to his heart being a man of profound Adhyatmika disposition. Celebrated as nations most distinguished banker, RK Talwar delivered a golden era for State Bank Of India during his tenure. He chaired Committee on Customer Service in 1975, popularly known as Talwar Committee whose recommendations are followed and often quoted even now. Before expiring in 2002 while living like an ascetic, he headed IDBI too for a couple of years as well as Directorship of several companies.  

His ‘Agni-Pariksha’ knocked at his door in the form of a sick cement company with mounting losses during post-1971 era when nations economy was in dire straits owing to refugee crisis followed by War-1971 with Pakistan. When they approached for rehabilitation assistance, SBI ostensibly followed their standard procedures and identified root-cause of sickness being gross mismanagement of the company by promoters. As a part of restructuring package, SBI insisted of a team of professional managers to be allowed to take over the company. Company resisted it and carried on till the last financial lifeline was available to them. After exhausting that lifeline too, they approached the Bank again for restructuring package but entire attrition boiled down again to the same old condition of management switchover to a team of professional managers. This time too, SBI stuck to their norms. However at this stage extra-ordinary promoter of the company bared his fangs and paws as he was a pal of Sanjay Gandhi, younger son of dreaded Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. As usual, Sanjay Gandhi summoned the then Finance Minister YB Chavan and ordered him to address the issue to the satisfaction of his friend. In most of such cases, issue ceased to be an issue right at that moment but here, it was a different situation altogether because Sanjay Gandhi was dealing with an unusual banker who was endowed with conscience as well as steel nerves.

Finance Minister instructed Chairman on phone to waive the condition of change of management intrinsic to the restructuring package. Chairman Talwar first called for details and held a meeting to satisfy himself with merits of the issue, then called Finance Minister to convey his decision in no uncertain terms. Minister then communicated explicitly to the Chairman to the effect that it was so desired by ‘highest authority’ of the land i.e. de facto Prime Minister Sanjay Gandhi, son of his mother Indira Gandhi. Chairman Talwar reiterated his position and declined to budge an inch. Sanjay Gandhi must have been astonished to hear his response as there was no one in the country by then who had guts to disobey him. On his orders, message was conveyed to the Chairman to come over to meet him, talk to him to sort out the issue ‘amicably’. Given his nerves that he possessed, Chairman Talwar turned down this call, conveyed to him that Sanjay Gandhi held no ‘Constitutional authority’, had no authority to summon him and he was answerable to Finance Minister only. Shocked and stunned, Sanjay Gandhi ordered Finance Minister to dismiss Chairman Talwar from service immediately.  

Dilemma before the Finance Minister at that moment of reckoning was two-fold. First was tremendous reputation of the Chairman in country which could have led to backlash on his dismissal and the other was immunity enjoyed by Chairman against dismissal under SBI Act without an irrefutable cause. After lot of deliberations and brainstorming, it was decided to offer him an alternate assignment of Chairmanship of a Banking Commission to be constituted, dedicated to restructuring public sector banks. Without wasting a second, Chairman Talwar offered to accept the position being offered without quitting Chairmanship of SBI, assured him to shoulder both responsibilities concurrently. Finance Minister was aghast at smart and irreconciliable moves of Chairman Talwar. It was then that Chairman looked straight into eyes of the Minister and inquired whether he desired him to quit. Finance Minister responded with a heavy heart that he had highest regards for Talwars abilities and performance yet he had no other option except to seek Talwars resignation or sack him as ‘highest authority’ in the country had staked his prestige in the matter and such an extreme measure would be profoundly agonising for the Minister. Thereupon Talwar delivered his final verdict to the effect that he had absolutely no intention to quit and Minister was at liberty to proceed in the matter whichever way he wished to. And he walked out leaving behind the Minister distraught and miserable. Details of the meeting exceedingly infuriated de facto Prime Minister Sanjay Gandhi when communicated to him. He could not believe for a few moments that someone in the country had the gumption to tell him that he was just nobody and his self-ordained status just didn’t matter to Chairman Talwar at all, that too while holding an office appointed by the Government. Sanjay Gandhi ordered CBI to conduct exploratory investigation to some how trap him and prepare ‘extra-ordinary’ situation to facilitate Talwars dismissal.

In spite of hair-splitting combing of conduct and working of SBI Chairman, even best brains in CBI could not establish even a single offence or instance of misconduct. Even his frequent visits to Aurbindo Ashrama in Puducherry, his devotion to Maharshi Aurbindo or his appeal to large number of industrialists soliciting donations for Aurovillo Project could not be transformed into sufficient ground for his dismissal. His appeal for contribution was only in public domain, no personal solicitation was rendered by him at all and no industrialist could tell CBI that they had received a telephone call directly or indirectly coercing into donations. Much to the chagrin and discomfiture of CBI, what was discovered by them was that Chairman Talwar had only forwarded a general appeal to donate signed and issued by the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and a commendation letter issued for the project released by the then UN Secretary General U Thant to industrialists !! CBI lost all hopes to trap Talwar and reported so to de facto Prime Minister that Sanjay Gandhi was during that darkest era in nations history. Sanjay Gandhi was so enraged that he ordered Finance Minister to amend SBI Act to facilitate summary dismissal of RK Talwar from Chairmanship of SBI.  

Amendment to the State Bank Of India Act was rushed through Parliament at a lightening speed that dismayed even the worst cynics in politics and it was dubbed ‘Talwar Amendment’. As if President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad had been already standing at gates of Rashtrapati Bhavan eager to sign all draconian laws passed during Emergency-1975, he assented ‘Talwar Amendment’ too in the same melee with a remarkable swiftness. Thereafter Chairman Talwar was again summoned by the Finance Minister, placed the sword of dismissal on his neck and asked him to resign. RK Talwar being made of a different stuff altogether, flatly declined to resign knowing very well about the amendment and sounded Finance Minister to proceed with ‘His Masters Voice’. On Aug. 4, 1976 Chairman Talwar received a fax message from Finance Minister asking him to proceed on compulsory leave for the rest of his tenure after handing over the charge of Office of Chairman to Managing Director. It was a huge surprise for many as Government during Emergency-1975 holding all powers in their hands, could not muster courage to sack Talwar and ordered him to proceed on leave. RK Talwar quietly walked out of his Office alone, sharp at 5.30 pm, his usual time to leave Office, never to look back. None in the Bank could muster courage to accord him a dignified farewell or bid him adieu at the exit gate.

But by that moment of reckoning, the banker with steel nerves had created history to be recalled many times over in future, an order from his superior that he accepted with maximum tranquility and poise, as a stoic who had unmitigated faith in divine will.         



For centuries and thousands of years Bharata and China never ever battled militarily. It was only under Nehru’s malevolent leadership that Bharata was attacked by China for the first time and the last Mughal was humiliated to his last bone and joint. It was entirely his personal defeat as he did not allow Army to prepare themselves, declined to provide their necessities and finally, did not allow our Air Force to retaliate in spite of their repeated propositions. He had actively pursued ‘Forward Policy’ and outrightly declined to settle the border dispute. As a matter of fact, Nehru had committed a complete Himalayan range of lethal blunders that led to slaughter of unarmed soldiers and capture of entire Akshai Chin by Chinese.

The last Mughal allowed Tibet being captured by China without even a whiff of resistance, then declined to settle border dispute;

signed entirely absurd and moronic Panchsheel Agreement;

changed country’s map unilaterally;

refused to even discuss their proposals;

followed irrational ‘Forward Policy’, raised border posts in disputed areas provoking China eternally convinced that China would never invade;

never looked after border posts;

infiltrated Army with sycophantic submissive officers and Generals;

completely neglected security issues; appointed a dubious character Krshna Menon as Defence Minister;

publicly declared on Oct. 12, 1962 he had ordered Army to throw out Chinese intruders barely 8 days before they attacked us;

just after 4 days of fighting on Oct. 24, China again offered to ceasefire and invited for discussions but Nehru declined;

on Nov. 21, 1962 China ceasefired the war unilaterally and offered to negotiate which was declined by Nehru again;

Nehru even declined to appoint a commission of inquiry to identify causes of defeat and climaxed it by refusing to resign in spite of the ignominy that the nation underwent owing to his serial stupidities.

Nehru-Menon duo unilaterally decided borders on their office desk, ordered raising 64 border posts here and there even into genuine Chinese territory, then proceeded to order those border posts to be manned by Assam Police and not by armed soldiers !! Both had ‘unilaterally’ convinced themselves, China would not dare to retaliate as that would have inevitably led to World War-III and in that eventuality, entire world would be on Nehrus side !! So much was narcisstic Nehru convinced about his personal popularity internationally !! He declared it a foreign policy masterstroke and named it ‘Forward Policy’ !! This policy was finalised in PMO on Nov. 2, 1961 in a meeting attended by the last Mughal Nehru, Krshna Menon, General PN Thapar, Lt. Gen. BM Kaul, IB Director BN Mullik, Brig. DK Palit and the then Foreign Secretary. Arun Shourie quoted Nehru, “It is completely impracticable for the Chinese Government to think of anything in the nature of invasion of India. Therefore I rule it out… It is necessary that the system of check-posts should be spread along this entire frontier. More especially, we should have check-posts in such places as might be considered disputed areas… As Demchok is considered by the Chinese as a disputed territory, we should locate a check-post there. So also at Tsang Chokla…”

Chinese being provoked to no limits by the recklessly insane policy was quite natural. Several political and diplomatic figures squarely blamed the last Mughal and his churlish conduct responsible for the Chinese invasion and subsequent humiliation. Chinese leader Mao had commented on Nehru sarcastically, “A person sleeping in a comfortable bed is not easily aroused by someone else’s snoring. Since Nehru sticks his head out and insists on us fighting him, for us not to fight with him would not be friendly enough. Courtesy emphasises reciprocity.” Nehru and Krshna Menon were again and again resorting to the rhetoric of ‘driving out Chinese to the last man’ from rooftops whether in Delhi or in Ceylon !! While New York Herald wrote an editorial titled ‘Nehru declared war on China’, The Chinese People’s Daily advised Nehru ‘pull back from the brink of the precipice and not to use the lives of Indian troops as stakes in your gamble’ !! Shocked at Nehru’s ‘throw them out’ order in public, COAS General Thapar rushed to Defence Minister Krshna Menon who non-chalantly responded, “This is a political statement. It means action can be taken in ten days or a hundred days or a thousand days.” Chao En Lai gave his last statement of settlement of border dispute through negotiations which again was sneered at while Mao ordered his forces to be ‘restrained and principled.’

The scale and level of preparations as well as training were so pathetic that majority of soldiers were sent to borders to fight without even snow-boots. Large number of soldiers belonging to Rajasthan and Haryana had never seen snow-fall before going to China border !! Yet they all fought till the last bullet and simply consumed themselves unhesitatingly but did not turn back under any circumstance. Gen. BM Kaul, probably the most disliked Army Commander in nation’s history, did not put his foot down knowing very well perils of Nehrus insane Forward Policy. Chinese intruded 160 miles into our territory by Nov. 20, 1962 and they were amazed, baffled at our lack of resistance and inadequate preparations. Mood of the nation was so bad that when rumour spread around that Gen. BM Kaul had been taken as POW, President Dr. Radhakrshnan commented wryly, “Unfortunately, it is untrue.” When everything was over, as usual Nehru admitted his shenanigans, “We were getting out of touch with reality in the modern world and we were living in an artificial atmosphere of our creation…we feel India has been ill-repaid for her diplomatic friendliness toward Peking… Difficult to say the Chinese have deliberately deceived us…we may have deceived ourselves…”

Buy by then, all was over and the last Mughal Nehru had nothing to lose.



Donald Trump had succeeded President Barack Hussein Obama in the White House in 2016 when America was The Last priority in the catalogue of outstanding issues before them. The way Obama was busy for eight years in compromising US interests be that climate or China, remitting millions of $$ to countries like Iran and Pakistan, allowing Communists to infiltrate entire government apparatus, reminded us all of second Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru for whom national interest was always the last priority. So close to winning second term with almost 49% votes polled in his favour in spite of all that so-called worldwide brouhaha and invectives and epithets being hurled at him, affirms beyond an iota of doubt, Donal Trump in reality has been one of the best Presidents in US history.

After President DD Eisenhower, he was the first President who studiously avoided futile wars in other countries counting body-bags being despatched followed by counting of bodies arriving in America unleashing outrage all over the country. It is so paradoxical that President Lyndon B Johnson could not muster courage to contest for second Presidential term due to raging outrage and sense of guilt he developed after carpet-bombing of Vietnam while Donald Trump has been ousted from the White House for not waging a single war anywhere in the world at all as he declined to be a War-monster.  

Trump successfully negotiated four Middle East Peace Accords that brought about paradigm shift in that region that appeared almost impossible hitherto spanning decades of friction and battles.

It is due to his much maligned tenure that America became not only energy self-sufficient but also energy exporter for the first time in their history.

He cancelled TPP, FTTs, replaced NAFTA by USMCA, re-calibrated trade deals with China and 50 other countries only to protect American economic interests. Donald Trump negotiated much more reasonable trade agreements with Canada, EU and Mexico instead of throwing away US interests like his predecessor.

President Trump was one of the greatest job-creators who drastically reduced unemployment among Blacks and Browns in his country. Had there been no Wuhan-pandemic unleashed by China surrepticiously, employment data of America would have been probably best in the world. With 7 million jobs created, unemployment lowest at 3.5%, unemployment dole claims lowest in 50 years, rise in middle class incomes by five times, are some of his spectacular milestones while Dow peaked at 30,000 in 2020.

Sterling economic contribution of Trump was in recalling hundreds of US businesses back to USA from China leaving Dragons sulking behind their viruses !! With tariff hikes and trade restrictions, Trump brought subdued China to negotiating table. It is yet another story that when he was fighting with ‘Tariff-King’ Prime Minister Modi for reduction of duties on Harley Davidson bikes, they ditched him and shifted to China from Texas !!

Trump launched largest tax reforms in history that led to reduction in tax liabilities by 50% for US middle class families.

He cancelled Paris Climate Accord signed with so much brag and bluster by his predecessor, unfair to US interests.

He quit WHO and withdrew funding them as WHO had been shielding China from the crime of unleashing the Wuhan-virus.

President Trump cancelled one-sided nuclear deal signed by Obama with Iran and imposed crippling sanctions. Nuclear Iran is certainly dangerous for almost half of humanity in the world.

He leashed relations with Cuba and fiercely resisted Communism in western hemisphere. It is mainly the Communist lobby responsible for his dubious defeat at his bid for second term.

Being an ardent American nationalist, he sought to expose corruption nibbling important bodies like FBI, CIA apart from both political parties.

Trump did not allow NATO continue sucking lifeline of America on one flimsy pretext or the other. He compelled them to pay for security rendered by the USA and they agreed to pay for that. Undoubtedly, he brought NATO to justice for the first time in US history.

He ruthlessly destroyed ISIS network, so-called Caliphate, killed Baghdadi in his own den and liberated the world from professional terrorists to a large extent.

He contained the ‘Rocket-man’ of North Korea indulging in missile acrobatics in Japanese skies, nuclear indulgence and potential threats to the US west coast, difficult task indeed.

Trump extended unqualified support to Prime Minister Modi on stand off with China over LAC. For Taiwan too, he was on the right side of pro-US diplomacy.  

He successfully appointed three Supreme Court Justices and 300 Federal Justices in spite of aggressive braying by Donkeys.

He reduced taxes, doubled standard deduction, stock market went into euphoric raptures by almost 100 times and strengthened US currency much dearer impacting positively large number of retirees too.

He developed Wuhan-pandemic vaccine in a record time-frame in comparison to development of Ebola vaccine that consumed six years or so in past.

Health care expenses were moderated including cost of prescription drugs after trashing Obamacare. It was an unprecedented achievement in US history of health sector.

He reorganised US Military debilitated by design under Obama regime and dismissed several Generals and Admirals failing to deliver and raised US Space Armed Force.

Trump tightened immigration laws in US interest, ended asylum fraud and human trafficking.

Significant reduction in illegal infiltration across Mexican border to the tune of 87% by raising a wall 400 miles long, is another remarkable achievement.

Undertook criminal justice reforms extensively.

Since Day One of his Presidency, people have been calling him names, raising clouds of heat and dust over his imprudent statements which he should have refrained from speaking out. These so-called infirmities simply pale away when you focus of his historic success in taming hostile Islamic forces, Communism and Chinese Dragon-fire. These forces are now so powerful that they can even destroy a prosperous mighty nation too. Let us see how Biden regime copes with them after announcing, “America is back.” An eminent journalist Glenn Greenwald reckons it to be militarism, imperialism and corporatism as Dem. Donkeys are “good at creating a brand radically different than the reality, those who fund them they believe in. It’s why you see neocons migrating so comfortably back to the Democratic Party, why you see Bush and Cheney operatives cheering for Joe Biden, why Wall Street celebrated when he picked Kamala Harris.”

If some supercilious sniggeratis of America find him crude, crass, nasty, bully, ‘Picasso of pettiness’, ‘Shakespeare of shit’,  devoid of charm, compassion, credibility, wisdom, vision, humility, grace, sense of humour, Soul itself…his mind being a ‘bot like Algorithm imbued with petty prejudices’, even his flaws full of flaws, even Nixon started looking trustworthy…or a monster entirely assembled by Dr. Frankenstein with human flaws then screaming around Oh God, what have I created…then it is essentially their own grave attitudinal issues to cope with. 

Undoubtedly, the man flew out of the White House in Air Force One for the last time to go down into US history as one of the greatest Presidents as well as for generations in future to regret for his ignominious ouster.

Published @